T3: timed total tonnage

[maurice86]

systeem van Keith Wassung, lijkt me toch wel wat:

My personal favorite squat (actually this will work well for the bench press or just about any compound movement) program is the T3 (timed total tonnage) routine. With this program, you have three workouts, 5x10, 5x5, 5x3, performed in a sequential fashion. On your first squat session, after a sufficient warm-up, you load the bar with a weight that allows you to achieve 10 hard repetitions, but not 11. The weight on the bar is then reduced to the highest possible poundage that you can still squat for 10 hard reps. This process is repeated for all five sets. The total tonnage for each set is then calculated by multiplying the weight x the number of reps. For example 225 for 10 reps would equal 2250lbs. If you only get 9 reps on a set, then multiply that accordingly. Add up the total weight lifted for each of the five sets. this is the total tonnage for the entire session. It might look like this.

1. 225 x 10 = 2250
2. 205 x 10 = 2050
3. 195 x 10 = 1950
4. 175 x 10 = 1750
5. 160 x 10 = 1600

TOTAL 9600lbs

Record this number in your training journal. The next time that you perform squats, you will do the exact same thing except that you will do 5 x 5. Record all of the sets and the total tonnage achieved. The third squat workout is 5 x 3 and then you are ready to start over with the 5 x 10. Your only objective is to increase the total tonnage of the entire 5 sets. You do not necessarily have to increase the weight on all 5 sets to do this. My goal was always to increase the first and heaviest set by at least 2.5-5lbs and then to increase at least one or more of the remaining sets. You should also have a set time in which to complete all 5 sets.
You are only comparing to the total tonnage of the 10's to your last workout with 10's, the 5's with the 5's and so on.

The tens will usually require a bit more time to complete than the fives or threes. It does not matter what time frame you set as long as it remains consistent. The first time you attempt this entire cycle, you might find it a bit difficult in correctly selecting weights than you can get for the required reps. This is perfectly normal, just stick with it and eventually you will become very accurate at weight selection.

In this program, the tens are the most physically challenging the threes are the most mentally challenging and the fives are somewhere in the middle. I have found that each of these separate workouts helps the other. After you complete the heavy triples, the weight used in the 10's feels light by comparison. After doing a grueling 10's workout the 3;s are almost like taking a break. The frequency of this program is an individual decision. I think that doing all 3 sessions in about a two -week time frame is a good starting point and then you can make adjustments as necessary.

In all my years, I have never seen a better or a more consistent result producing program that the one described above ( 10-5-3) for developing a foundation of strength and development. It is heavily borrowed from Bill Starr with some modifications, mostly that you dont do it 3 times in one week. He also refers to it has heavy-medium and light days. I prefer high reps, medium reps and low reps, because trust me, the "light" day of tens, is anything but light and anything but easy and whe you rack the weight after the fifth set of ten, you are so relieved to not have to do that for at least two more weeks. Many years ago, I had a guy named Roy approach me, he was a recon marine, tough as nails, about 5'8", 170lbs, little or no bodyfat and he has been training for about 6-7 years and was stuck at a 500lb squat. He wanted to get his squat up to around 540 in hopes of going to the All-Marine PL camp. I told him about this program and he laughed at me saying the volume was way too low to produce gains, but he agreed to give it a shot. The first day we did tens-after the 3rd set he vomited, after the 4th set, he vomited really, really hard, I did not have him perform a 5th set, he recovered and came about 5 days later to do the 5's, after about 6 months on the program, he weighed a solid 185lbs and qualified for the PL camp with a 630 squat and other gains in the rest of his lifts.

Its a great program, but certainly not "the" program, but I have always gained on it and anyone that I have ever know that has used it has raved about the gains. The guys that have struggled with it and then quit did not take the time (4-6 weeks) to really learn how to select the proper weights for each set-this takes some practice.

There is nothing "magic" about the numers 10-5-3, you can use 12-6-2 if you like, they are just round numbers ( easy to multiply) but the idea is to gradually work at increasing your workload in each of the series of sets. Do not go overboard on this and use it for every single move you have-I would limit it to one or two exercises ( such as squat and bench) at any give phase in your training. I have used it sucessfully on a variety of compound and assistance exercises. You can add some variety-for example, I am currently doing the 10-5-3 for the squats where the first 3 exercises are full squats and the last two are front squats-and the weight is multiplied in the same way. Be creative, but be consistent.

"Whatever you can measure you can improve"

Keith

[Gillian]

Ik ken het. O.a Paddos doet het voor z'n OH als ik het goed heb.

[Flying Fox]

Goeie post

Origineel gepost door Gillian

Ik ken het. O.a Paddos doet het voor z'n OH als ik het goed heb.

Ik ken het ook. Wat zijn wij toch slim zeg.

[Lanfeust]

ik heb dit blijkbaar lang gedaan zonder het te weten. Maar niet bepaald met iedere set gewicht zakken. Als ik kon, deed ik dan 2 sets met hetzelfde gewicht tot ik echt moest zakken.

[salieri]

Ziet er wel interessant uit.
Misschien is voor bench proberen ofzo ..

[Gillian]

Origineel gepost door Flying Fox

Goeie post

Ik ken het ook. Wat zijn wij toch slim zeg.

Wij zijn briljant. Zo briljant dat het gewoon eng is! Jammer dat we nog steeds zo zwak zijn...

[Flying Fox]

Origineel gepost door Gillian

Wij zijn briljant. Zo briljant dat het gewoon eng is! Jammer dat we nog steeds zo zwak zijn...

Jup. Maar langs de andere kant bewijzen we wel maar mooi dan de uitdrukking "knowledge is power" complete onzin is

[Gillian]

Origineel gepost door Flying Fox

Jup. Maar langs de andere kant bewijzen we wel maar mooi dan de uitdrukking "knowledge is power" complete onzin is

[willem9]

Interessant artikel. Zal het eens implementeren in 1 van mijn volgende schema's.

[Lanfeust]

Origineel gepost door Flying Fox

Jup. Maar langs de andere kant bewijzen we wel maar mooi dan de uitdrukking "knowledge is power" complete onzin is

ik lees regelmatig je posts, maar er komt daar dus nooit een serieus woord uit. gelukkig doet zot zijn geen pijn (daar kan ik ook een hartig woordje over meepraten)

[Flying Fox]

Origineel gepost door Lanfeust

ik lees regelmatig je posts, maar er komt daar dus nooit een serieus woord uit. gelukkig doet zot zijn geen pijn (daar kan ik ook een hartig woordje over meepraten)

Damn, is het zo erg gesteld? Ik heb wel de neiging ook mijn serieuze posts niet serieus te brengen, ik moet daar eens mee opletten

[maurice86]

stats van de man zij ook niet mis:

bench 480 lb
squat 710
dead 665
ohp 340

he walks the walk and talks the talk